Elamite kings who had ruled earlier than the time that the texts were compiled. Sometimes concise and generally comparatively longer, the data provided by the chronicle writers in regards to the illnesses of the Assyrian, Babylonian, and Elamite kings, and even in regards to the Isin king Erra-imitti contribute to our knowledge about the medical historical past of historical Mesopotamia. The information in these information might be evaluated on the subject of medical historical past in the primary millennium BC. Including information in regards to the medical disorders concerning kings, the chronicles contents can contribute to evaluations of the relationship between the political, religious and traditional elements of Babylonian historiography. What's the reason behind the truth that no detailed information is given concerning the illnesses of the Assyrian and Babylonian kings, while the well being situations and deaths of their contemporary Neo-Elamite kings embrace more details? However, only within the chronicles is it doable to encounter particulars about the illnesses of the Elamite kings. It's certain that the scribe or scribes, who talked about these pieces of information, are keen to go away no stone unturned about data and the details concerning the disabilities or deaths of the Elamite kings. In this examine, the data concerning the illnesses and disabilities of the Mesopotamian and Elamite kings in these chronicles can be discussed.
Particular attention will likely be given to the small print regarding illnesses with fatal consequences for Mesopotamian. Therefore, all of these examples have nice significance since they replicate the dominant understanding regarding the ancient Mesopotamian historiography: a religious belief that the sickness is a divine punishment arising from the faults of a person. One reply could be that the scribes couldn't find adequate info in the historic sources about these points while compiling the chronicles. The frequent trait of virtually all of the kings, about whom the chronicles give detailed data concerning their illnesses, is that they were all remembered negatively close to the historical past of Babylonia. It may be considered that these kings were not remembered with ill emotions by later generations. While the Neo-Babylonian king Nabunassar (747-734 BC) died after becoming sick in his palace, another Babylonian king Nabonidus (555-539 BC) was also ailing however recovered. The king fell ailing during one of his campaigns and subsequently died. Recorded concisely and chronologically, they detail events beginning from the Babylonian king Nabunassar period in 747-734 BC and continue to the interval simply after the capture of Babylonia by the Persians in 539 BC. This was because they had been starting to purchase tablets.
It's been three years since my associates and i purchased tablets and have been searching for video games. So asking my friends what they do not like about video video games is half the query. Additionally, it was recorded that some of the kings (like the Babylonian king Nabunassar) died in the palaces, even with out getting sick. Similarly, this relation is conspicuous in the health problems of the Sargon of Akkad and Isin king Erra-imitti written in the records of the Chronicles of the Early Kings and Weidner as properly. In addition, different chronicles such as the Weidner Chronicle and the Chronicle of Early Kings regarding this interval might be referenced significantly as well. This research aims to debate why data in regards to the medical issues (some of which caused loss of life), of the kings have been thought-about as outstanding by the chronicle scribes. Additionally, different pieces of data in other chronicles reminiscent of Esarhaddon, Weidner, and Chronicle of Early Kings can be referred to when needed.
However, it is extremely clear that the illnesses and disabilities of the Neo-Elamite kings, who reigned during the first millennium BC, are mentioned in additional element by the chronicle scribes. In this examine, we'll give attention to the illnesses and disabilities mentioned within the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles Series (ABC 1-7 and MC 16-17, 21-26) which were compiled in the second half of the primary millennium BC. Bu calismada M.O. I. binyilin ikinci yarisinda derlenen Yeni Babil Kronikleri'ndeki (ABC 1-7 ve MC 16-17, 21-26) hastaliklar ve sakatliklarla ilgili kayitlar ele alinacaktir. Calisma M.O. 3. binyilin ortalarindan M.O. Bu kayitlardaki bilgilerin soz konusu binyilin tip tarihi acisindan tarihsel degeri degerlendirilmeye calisilacaktir. However, even if these details are supported by data from other cuneiform sources and even whether it is medically possible, it doesn't change the possible views asserted in the research in regards to the intentions behind including them to the chronicles. However, these medical particulars within the chronicles are essential close to Babylonian historiography. In short, it is observed that the medical backgrounds of a number of the numerous Babylonian and Assyrian kings are mentioned in the Neo-Babylonian Chronicles and that these references are solely superficial.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar